סקס תחת ענק נערות ליווי המלצות

Hello Gentlemen, My name is Brianna, I'm independent, and available for outcalls only. I see I cau Sandra I am an Exotic Beauty!! Very down to earth girl that offers true GF Ivana hello,swedish blond with sexy blue eyeslong legs 5'10" sexy curvy body with fun personality,s Monica Hello Gentlemen, I am a once in a lifetime experience. Everything you know will change once I am a petite eu Ariana Gentlemen,Welcome to the world of Ariana, your playful, sexy sweetheart.

Where you can indu Care to show me yours? Angelika This extremely open-minded companion ensures a lot of fun and unbelievable experience. Patricia Patricia has striking good looks and a seductive warmth and sensuality that is highly into All the way girl. You Live only once. Private rooms See all. They will use it to defend their own counter actions when they try to shatter criticism and crush critics without mercy. I am of the opinion that the Church of Scientology is a criminal organisation and a cult which is designed by its delusional founder to abuse people.

I am still committed to fight for their right to speak their opinion. Church of Scientology related websites, such as religiousfreedomwatch.

Treason, evidence, argument, and free speech". Willis] [Ceon Ramon] [charlatan] Term frequently applied to Hubbard. Rogers] [David Dennis] American critic. Left-Field Marshal] [Eric S. Smith] [espinol] [Ethercat] [Ex Mudder] American critic. Berry] American critic and lawyer. Granbury] [Homer] [Hud Nordin] American critic. Randolph] [ John Dorsay ] Canadian critic. Wollersheim] American critic and former Scientologist.

Still a major figure in the cult. Is he held against his will? Is this an example of mind-control?. Dennis L Erlich] American critic and former Scientologist. Minton] See Bob Minton. Name not spelled correctly though. The name is a play on the Russian term "samizdat", or underground free press. United States General Terrorism News: No contest, animals win Bunnies taking toll on cars at Denver airport Cayman Islands woman bites intruder, loses tooth Knut the polar bear becomes museum display Man accused biting off ear lobe pleads not guilty NYC rape evidence gets stricter oversight Hula!

Thailand breaks hula hoop dancing record Hacker warns of zombies on 2 Mich. Jerry Buss, Lakers' flamboyant owner, dies at 80 Girlfriend's mom: Why did he do this?

This is getting interesting. While Scientology does have very large financial resources and teams of lawyers to fight their battles, this group, Anonymous, is probably more than what Scientology can handle. It is not one person, not one group of people, in all likelihood it is a loose collection of people from all over the world.

These are smart people who know how to get around on the internet, how to remain hidden and also how to cause lots of problems for the Scientologists! Petersburg , Florida, USA. Keith Henson was convicted for posting this to the Net. Why do I get the feeling they don't like me? Freedom of speech means we need to allow all to speak - including those we strongly disagree with.

Hosts critical pages by Jeff Lee. That's when the galactic overlord Xenu came to this planet and killed a lot of aliens here Norwegian critic, webmaster Operation Clambake. American critic, webmaster of www.

סקס תחת ענק נערות ליווי המלצות Nobody in Brussels suspects that the Italian dye factory has never had anything to do with uranium before and פורנו חזק מבוגרות בסקס signed the papers because it considers itself merely a middleman, tempted by a hefty commission. Vanunu is among these — and even before he picks up his discharge papers he joins the Communist Party "Profession: That legendary head of government and founding father of Israel is סקס תחת ענק נערות ליווי המלצות with the idea that the Holocaust might be repeated, and his central fear is that this time the Jews would be driven to the brink of extinction by fanatical Arabs. Thailand breaks hula hoop dancing record Hacker warns of zombies on 2 Mich. It would depend on what the US could get in trade, perhaps in a three-way deal involving the Soviets and their spies now in Israeli jails. A nuclear reactor and plutonium production facility was built by France at this facility in the late s and early 60s.

Ivana hello,swedish blond with sexy blue eyeslong legs 5'10" sexy curvy body with fun personality,s Monica Hello Gentlemen, I am a once in a lifetime experience. Everything you know will change once I am a petite eu Ariana Gentlemen,Welcome to the world of Ariana, your playful, sexy sweetheart.

Where you can indu Care to show me yours? Angelika This extremely open-minded companion ensures a lot of fun and unbelievable experience. Patricia Patricia has striking good looks and a seductive warmth and sensuality that is highly into All the way girl. While I don't think that will stop Anonymous, it is just the sort of "homeland terrorism" the feds are looking to legislate against.

The National Commission on the Prevention of Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism is not just for violence, bombers, guns and the like. It includes words, speech and ideology! And while the Scientologists probably don't fully realize, yet, what they are in for, I think the full realization will lead to some really funny reactions from the likes of Cruise! January 23, at 2: The Internet-based group "Anonymous" has released statements on YouTube and via a press release, outlining what they call a "War on Scientology".

Church of Scientology related websites, such as religousfreedomwatch. On Friday, the same group allegedly brought down Scientology's main website , scientology. Commenting on the video, the piece The Michigan Daily states "if this video is any indication, it seems like source. On Friday, the same group allegedly brought down Scientology 's main website, scientology.

Several websites relating to the Church of Scientology have been slowed down, brought to a complete halt or seemingly removed from the Internet completely in an attack which seems to be continuous. On Monday, the group released a video titled: A robotic voice on the video begins with "Hello leaders of Scientologyreason, evidence, argument, and free speech".

On Tuesday, the founder of Operation Clambake , a non-profit organization and website critical of Scientology based in Stavanger, Norway , released a statement about the attacks by "Anonymous". Andreas Heldal-Lund was critical of the "Anonymous" groups actions, stating: Attacking Scientology like that will just make them play the religious persecution card.

They will use it to defend their own counter actions when they try to shatter criticism and crush critics without mercy. I am of the opinion that the Church of Scientology is a criminal organisation and a cult which is designed by its delusional founder to abuse people.

I am still committed to fight for their right to speak their opinion. Church of Scientology related websites, such as religiousfreedomwatch. Treason, evidence, argument, and free speech". Willis] [Ceon Ramon] [charlatan] Term frequently applied to Hubbard. Rogers] [David Dennis] American critic. Left-Field Marshal] [Eric S.

Smith] [espinol] [Ethercat] [Ex Mudder] American critic. Jensen pretended to accept the bait, and under the guidance of the FBI and the Justice Department, passed carefully selected material to two Israeli contacts named Abramski and Nevoth these names are from a declassified State Department document in which only last names are given.

When Jensen was reassigned to Washington, Abramski and Nevoth followed to continue the arrangement. As the Israelis had no diplomatic immunity in this country, the State and Justice Departments concurred in writing that prosecution should proceed under both the Foreign Agent Registration Act and applicable US espionage laws.

Nevertheless, for reasons I have so far been unable to determine, Abramski and Nevoth apparently were not arrested and prosecuted. The FBI's primary concern was the safety of classified documents on weapons-related technology, which were stored at Apollo. Frequent visitors from Israel had access to the documents, and one of those visitors, Rafael Eitan, was known to have Israeli intelligence connections.

Yes, it's the same Rafael Eitan involved in the Pollard case. Further, the security clearances of Dr. Yosef Langotsky, who came to the FBI's attention shortly after his assignment in mid to the Israeli Embassy in Washington as assistant army attach'e. Langotsky repeatedly wandered into secure areas at the Pentagon, and clumsily tried to recruit Pentagon employees to commit espionage. After several warnings to the Israeli Embassy, the Defense Department simply refused him all cooperation and any access to the Pentagon.

In early , Langotsky was quietly recalled to Israel by his government. Several of his colleagues had reported the individual for what they thought were security improprieties involving Israeli military and intelligence officials. No classified material was located during the search, though hundreds of the college's library books were found which had been obtained fraudulently and subsequently mutilated or destroyed. The Defense Department turned the matter over to a federal prosecutor.

In an arrangement with the prosecutor, the individual pleaded guilty in federal district court in Alexandria, Va. The arrangement included his immediate resignation as a civilian staff member of the Defense Intelligence Agency, of which the college is part. None of the security aspects of the case were ever brought to trial.

The individual involved is currently director of Mideast studies at a university in the Washington, D.

Pollard said he could understand his son's feelings when he learned the US was not sharing with Israel the intelligence information it had on gas plants in Syria [and] impending PLO attacks from Lebanon.

The image here is of a bright young American Jew deeply torn between his concern about the survival of Israel and his duty as a US intelligence official to protect his own country's security secrets. There's a certain logic to this image, and even some elements of truth. But this is not why Jonathan Pollard is serving a life sentence. There is more to the story. S OON after Pollard's arrest in November , his Defense Investigative Service and FBI interrogators became convinced that much if not most of the "take" in fact had nothing to do with Israel's essential national security interests.

The problem was essentially this, The Defense Investigative Service and the FBI knew from lists hidden in Pollard's desk that he had been very specifically tasked. That is, his Israeli handlers had developed intelligence requirements for particular documents, by name and number.

Initially, this indicated the possibility of another agent - the infamous "Mr. X" - who was pointing the operation toward the documents Pollard was to steal. In a polygraph interrogation, however, Pollard confirmed what US defense officials already suspected: One of the first documents he'd been asked to take was a huge compendium of current classified military documents which is updated every three months.

This lists and describes tens of thousands of documents - a virtual road map for Pollard's handlers. No need for Mr. So what Pollard took was exactly what the Israelis wanted. But what did they want? The initial shock came when the FBI analyzed the 25 documents found in a suitcase Anne Pollard had removed from their apartment on her husband's instructions, after he was first questioned at the Pentagon.

The question "Is there a Mr. Now there was a new question: The transcripts, together with computer records at the Defense Intelligence Agency and within the agency, at the Defense Intelligence College , where Pollard gained access to many of the stolen documents, have subsequently revealed that much of the operation's take had nothing to do with the Middle East at all - it contained details of US and Soviet intelligence, communications and military capabilities.

This included, according to the government's Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, "details about US ship positions, aircraft stations, tactics, and training operations. This concern was heightened when, during the Pollard investigation, a Soviet defector in US hands revealed that in addition to the two Soviet spies serving prison terms in Israel Shabtai Kalmanovitch and Marcus Klingberg , there was a third who had not been caught.

He was well placed in the Defense Ministry, and still "active. A second theme of Pollard's supporters is that the sentence was too harsh because the compromised documents, however voluminous and important, were sent to an ally. They question whether much damage was in fact done. The issue is fairly joined here, because it was almost certainly Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger's page classified submission to the court about damage to US security which led Judge Aubrey Robinson to issue a life sentence.

In the months since Pollard went to prison, his supporters have taken Mr. Weinberger to task for his role in the sentencing process. Dershowitz has characterized Weinberger's statements as "dirty pool. Wolf Blitzer is a bit more circumspect in his book, admitting that Pollard had indeed damaged national security. But he adds the curious caveat that much of the damage had been contained, "because of the exposure of the operation" and because "US and Israeli intelligence -officials have cooperated - albeit not completely - to repair the damage.

Among the things Pollard sent to the Israelis, according to government submissions, were: None of the documents recouped in his apartment were excised: None of the documents returned by the Israeli government had been excised. The compromised documents, in other words, revealed all details about the intelligence sources and methods used to collect the information.

Even if Pollard had tried to-excise sources and methods, he did not have the competence to do so. We are speaking about hundreds of thousands of pages, thousands of documents, and hundreds of subjects. The information compromised included US military satellite photographs.

If a foreign intelligence organization simply sees the photograph in a technical journal, all it has is the subject in the photo, the fact that the National Security Agency is interested, and some indication of the power and resolution of the satellite cameras.

But if foreign analysts get their hands on the original or even a good photocopy of the photo itself, they also get all the telemetry data that was printed around the edges - the location, distance, altitude, altitude and degree of angle of the satellite, among other things. With this information in foreign hands, the NSA must reposition, or even change the orbit of the satellite, at great expense, and the element of surprise is lost.

This is what Weinberger meant when he referred to "[the loss of] national assets which have taken many years, great effort, and enormous national resources to secure," Three separate Defense Department sources who took part in the Pollard operation damage exercise have been unable or unwilling to put a specific dollar figure on the loss.

But all three have, independently referred to "several billions of dollars" as a rough estimate, with the vast majority of that loss occurring to the technical collection resources of the NSA. And at that, we haven't counted the networks destroyed and the extreme personal risks caused for spies whose identities, locations, and activities were revealed. It makes virtually no difference that the pages went to Israel as opposed to, say, Czechoslovakia. No modern national security apparatus would risk many lives or billions of dollars on operations whose security it no longer controlled.

Once it is gone, it's gone. If Pollard had taken half the material and mailed it to KGB headquarters in Moscow, and had merely given the other half to a friend in Bethesda, Md. In this case, the material went to a foreign power whose intelligence services the US had reason to believe were already penetrated by the Soviets. Former CIA director Richard Helms was recently asked in connection with Pollard, whether the US should distinguish between those who sell secrets to friends on the one hand, or enemies on the other.

His answer was, no, it shouldn't, "for the simple reason that we don't know about the security of those other governments. Helms's comment underscores another important point about the "take" in the Pollard operation: It is only the government of Israel, meaning the entirety of its security establishment, that could have used the voluminous material stolen in this case. In his book, Mr. Blitzer is very careful to point out that when Mr. Peres became prime minister in September shortly after Pollard was recruited , Mr.

Eitan "was asked to give up his counter terrorism responsibility. My source for this is Thomas Pickering, then US ambassador to Israel, who, when Eitan's name became connected to the case, was asked by the State Department about the man's ties to the prime minister.

He responded as indicated above in a "Secret" telegram No. It was declassified in in response to a freedom of information request from this writer. Perhaps the most embarrassing aspect of the Pollard matter, from Israel's standpoint, and the primary reason that those directly involved would like to see the Pollards released and the issue permanently resolved and out of the news, is the question of the policy context for the operation.

Was Pollard the first person to spy for Israel against the US, or was he only the first one to be caught doing so, or was he only the first one to be caught and prosecuted! You would be correct if you answered "none of the above. Blitzer distinguishes between "friendly espionage" and the nasty kind where agents are recruited and money is paid for information. The former is collected by overt technical means or by the reports of military and other accredited attaches.

This Israel has done to America, and the US does to Israel, and everybody does to everybody else,-B-ut for decades, Blitzer maintains, the US and Israel have abided by an agreement not to spy on each other the nasty way. That is provable nonsense. The Israeli government is even less equivocal on this matter than Blitzer. Shortly after Pollard's arrest, Prime Minister Peres issued a statement which said, in part: Not now, not when Pollard was recruited, and not at any time going back to the very establishment of Israel's first embassies in Washington and at the United Nations in The list in the accompanying article is by no means complete.

Documentary evidence exists of similar cases. Why are they not better known! Because prior to Jonathan Pollard, according to one senior FBI counterespionage official, "95 percent of the cases developed resulted in declinations [to prosecute]. The cases were dropped at the last moment. Pollard was certainly not the first and he probably won't be the last Israeli spy in America: He was just the most effective.

That said, my sense is that many if not most in the US intelligence and military communities would be delighted to accommodate Pollard's family and supporters, and release the man and his wife to their adopted country. It would depend on what the US could get in trade, perhaps in a three-way deal involving the Soviets and their spies now in Israeli jails. There is generally no rancor in Washington toward Pollard personally. And in any event, the damage is already done. But you can be sure that whatever has happened in the past, the next Israeli caught spying in America will be treated as a spy.

Their discussions, according to Bruce Rice, NUMEC's security manager, "concerned the possibility of developing plutonium-fueled, thermo-electric generator systems in the 5- and milliwatt power level. The Israelis were particularly interested in 10 generators in the 5-milliwatt range, which would be fueled by about 2 grams of plutonium. During a meeting with then-U. The late Carl Duckett, former CIA deputy director, found it "hard to reconcile Shapiro not recalling Lahav when the matter was first raised, but subsequently thinking he was the man he met in Pittsburgh," Duckett wrote in a letter to Henry Myers, former Udall aide, in response to Shapiro's unsworn testimony during an informal meeting with Udall's subcommittee in Shapiro also said he met the head of Israel's military intelligence during his trips there.

But, Shapiro said, he had no knowledge of Israel's nuclear weapons capabilities. Again, Duckett doubted Shapiro. Given Shapiro's background, his interest in Israel and "his contacts with senior Israeli officials concerned with nuclear matters, Continuing speculation After about a decade of investigations, federal authorities could not find significant evidence that Shapiro diverted uranium to the Israelis.

But that didn't end speculation. To bolster his argument, Hersh points to the large quantities of uranium found, according to the NRC, when the Apollo plant was decommissioned and taken apart in the s. In an interview with the Valley News Dispatch, former Udall aide Myers, who is not represented in a positive light in Hersh's book, questioned the validity of Hersh's claims and wondered why more people did not criticize the book.

Federal agents also considered the possibility that NUMEC's partnership with Israel on food irradiation made it easier to smuggle uranium out of the country. The worker, whose name is deleted in a November FBI document, told agents he believed the losses in uranium occurred about the same time NUMEC was involved in developing and manufacturing at least one large irradiator and several smaller units called "Howitzers" and shipping them to Israel.

The employee believed if enriched uranium was to be illegally shipped to Israel, "it would have been a simple matter of placing the material in these food irradiator units in large quantities and shipped to Israel with no questions asked," according to the FBI report. No one would have opened or examined them or had reason to question their contents. Shapiro insisted to Congressional investigators that such a phone did not exist and that the telex machines at NUMEC were ordinary.

Some of the missing material also was likely buried as waste on the plant site, he said. Diversion or sloppy records? Seaborg wrote to U. Therefore, it cannot be said unequivocally that theft or diversion has not taken place.

The losses were way beyond what we would have anticipated. We felt that Shapiro was deliberately negligent to cover the losses. News of the buried waste came as a surprise to the AEC, according to an Aug. Shapiro stated this new source of valuable waste was contained in about drums of scraps and cleanup material. The buried waste was exhumed in October , but only six kilograms of uranium - 56 kilograms short of what Shaprio said should be there - of nuclear material was recovered.

Why was he going public on television? All this did was get him in trouble in life. The thing about Duckett is he had no reason to lie. This is the second of three parts regarding the history of the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp. The Phantom of Dimona. Translation by Victor Diodon. Black Market of Horror:

0 People reacted on this

Leave a Reply:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *